USAHEC: Landpower: FORCE DEVELOPMENT & MODERNIZATION

INTRODUCTION

"We must immediately begin the process of re-examining and challenging our most basic institutional assumptions, organizational structures, paradigms, policies, and procedures to better serve our Nation. The end result of this examination will be a more relevant and ready force – a campaign-quality Army with Joint and Expeditionary Mindset. Our Army will retain the best of its current capabilities and attributes while developing others that increase relevance and readiness to respond to the current and projected strategic and operational environments.” --
The Way Ahead, General Peter J. Schoomaker, CSA, 2003-2007.

"Army Experimentation: Developing the Army of the Future-Army 2020"
by Van Brewer and Michala Smith
Military Review 94, no. 4 (July 2014): 58-62.
"Challenging Army Force Design"
by E.J. Degen and John W. Spencer
Small Wars Journal 10, no. 9 (September 22, 2014):
"Force Design"
by Scott Fortes
Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin 44, no. 1 (January 2018): 17-19.
"Making Long-Range Planning Work: The Case of the US Army's 30-Year Strategic Modernization Plan"
By Hassan M. Kamara
Defense & Security Analysis 31, no.3 (July 2015): 260-269.
"Why The Army Needs A Futures Command"
by Neil Hollenbeck and Benjamin Jensen
War on the Rocks, December 6, 2017.

Assessing the Army's Active-Reserve Component Force Mix ~[172]~ Joshua Klimas, et al.
~[134]~: Root Hall: UA25 .K55 2014
(Santa Monica: RAND, 2014)
Defense Logistics: Army Should Track Financial Benefits Realized from its Logistics Modernization Program
(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office, November 2013)
Force 2025 and Beyond: The U.S. Army's Holistic Modernization Strategy.
~[134]~: Root Hall: UA23 .A95I7 15-01
(Arlington, VA: Association of the United States Army, January 2015)
Force Planning Considerations for Army XXI ~[172]~ William Thomas Johnsen
~[134]~: Ridgway Hall U413 .R32 J638 1998 -- Root Hall U413 .A66 J629 1998
(Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 1998)

The Army Modernization Imperative: A New Big Five for the Twenty-First Century
by Rhys McCormick and Andrew Hunter
(Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies; Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, May 31, 2017)
Getting It Right: Determining the Optimal Active Component End Strength of the All-Volunteer Army to Meet the Demands of the 21st Century
by John R. Evans
(Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence, June 2015)
Near-Term U.S. Army Modernization: Buying What is Available and Buying Time
by Daniel Goure
(Arlington, VA: Lexington Institute, 2017)

AR 5-22 Army Force Modernization Component System
This regulation establishes the Army Force Modernization Proponent System. It establishes policy, responsibilities, relationships, and procedures necessary to execute the Army Force.
AR 71-32 Force Development and Documentation
This regulation updates policies for developing and documenting organizational requirements and authorizations, and for establishing certain force development functions in the Office
of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G–3/5/7

Army Force Management School (Fort Belvoir, Virginia)
The Army Force Management School's mission is to provide Army-wide force management education and training to leaders, soldiers, and civilians.
U.S. Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-8
Deputy Chief of Staff, G–8, is the principal military advisor to the ASA (FM&C) for program development and justification; G-8 coordinates with the ASA (ALT) on all proposed programming recommendations that are related to ongoing acquisition program and science and technology initiatives. . . General Order #1.